<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099</id><updated>2008-01-10T07:27:14.442Z</updated><title type='text'>Betting Casinos Poker::UK Gambling Blog</title><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml'/><author><name>jo</name></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>304</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-4960196439240376959</id><published>2007-03-29T23:57:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2007-03-29T23:58:52.907+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Lord No No to Super Casinos</title><content type='html'>A bunch of old unelected grey-haired blokes with nothing better to do have said no to the government plans for a super casino - and the additional 16 casinos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Isn't democracy a great thing?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From the Beeb: &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6500859.stm"&gt;Lords scupper super-casino plan &lt;/a&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2007/03/lord-no-no-to-super-casinos.html' title='Lord No No to Super Casinos'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6500859.stm' title='Lord No No to Super Casinos'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=4960196439240376959' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/4960196439240376959'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/4960196439240376959'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-117277137581548656</id><published>2007-03-01T17:42:00.000Z</published><updated>2007-03-01T17:49:35.833Z</updated><title type='text'>Betfair $600 Sign Up Bonus</title><content type='html'>I don't usually do a straightforward promotion, but I like &lt;a href="http://www.betfairpoker.com/?rfr=599/" target="_blank"&gt;Betfair&lt;/a&gt; and what they're trying to do in this industry, so its good to give them a plug every so often.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.betfairpoker.com/?rfr=599/"&gt;Betfair&lt;/a&gt; changed poker software late last year to a new platform and its pretty good. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Their latest promotion offers up to $600 depending on the number of points you generate. Use BFP600 to qualify for the deal when you sign up&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;here's the deal:&lt;br /&gt;• Sign up using the promotional code &lt;strong&gt;BFP600&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• Receive a bonus of up to $600* based on the number of Betfair Points generated &lt;br /&gt;• Bonus is effective from your first hand played &lt;br /&gt;• First hand must be played within 30 days of registration to qualify &lt;br /&gt;• Bonus is valid for 60 days only &lt;br /&gt;• Bonus is paid every Wednesday for Betfair Points generated in the previous week i.e. Player will receive $10 if they generate 400 Betfair Points &lt;br /&gt;• Payments are made in increments of $10 &lt;br /&gt;The bonus will be paid every Wednesday and is effective from first hand played&lt;br /&gt;*See Terms &amp; Conditions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now pop along to &lt;a href="http://www.betfairpoker.com/?rfr=599/"&gt;Betfair Poker &lt;/a&gt; to sign up</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2007/03/betfair-600-sign-up-bonus.html' title='Betfair $600 Sign Up Bonus'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.betfairpoker.com/?rfr=599/' title='Betfair $600 Sign Up Bonus'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=117277137581548656' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/117277137581548656'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/117277137581548656'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-117017671788929287</id><published>2007-01-30T16:49:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-01-30T17:05:17.926Z</updated><title type='text'>And the Super Casino Goes To....</title><content type='html'>....Manchester.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contrary to speculation and expectation, Manchester beat out London and Blackpool to win the race to build the UK's first 'super casino'- the close, but not quite Las Vegas style casino. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 'super' that makes it a super casino is that it will be allowed to have 1250 slots with unlimited jackpot prizes - instead of the restricted 2000GBP machines allowed currently. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A number of 'large' casinos were also named in: Great Yarmouth, Hull, Newham, Middlesbrough, Solihull, Milton Keynes, Leeds and Southampton and 'small' casino licenses in: Bath and North East Somerset, Dumfries and Galloway, East Lindsey, Luton, Scarborough, Swansea, Torbay and Wolverhampton&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course every politician is now freaking out. They would never go to Vegas. Never. Never. Never. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source: &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6312707.stm"&gt;Manchester wins super-casino race&lt;/a&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2007/01/and-super-casino-goes-to_30.html' title='And the Super Casino Goes To....'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6312707.stm' title='And the Super Casino Goes To....'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=117017671788929287' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/117017671788929287'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/117017671788929287'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-115990010745730115</id><published>2006-10-03T19:14:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-10-03T19:28:27.476+01:00</updated><title type='text'>The US Finally Pulls the Plug on Online Gambling</title><content type='html'>wow - I go away for a few days and everything goes to pot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill to ban online gambling has finally been put through in the US - albeit in a sneaky underhanded way - then again, what do you expect from this US government these days? So the mighty 'free world' across the pond once again works its magic and brings in a mix of prohibition, protectionism, nannying and moralistic craziness - in which its own online poker playing people don't even get a say - so much for democracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill was put through at the last minute as the Senate takes a break - and stuck onto a completely unrelated bill about Port Security. In effect, it bans the transfer of funds via financial institutions such as credit cards and banks - something the banks did voluntarily a few years ago anyway. It doesn't modernise the Wire Act whatsoever and causes legitimate companies to scurry out of the US market - leaving in their place the dubious, shady companies the bill was trying to stop in the first place as they no doubt will find a way to collect from US players&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bill Frist - who took the anti-online gambling bill on the road amidst Right-Wing Christian moral and ethical concerns (stop smirking please) and no doubt some interference from 'interested parties' (there are exemptions to the Bill which include lotteries and online horse racing amongst others). Frist himself is a potential presidential candidate in 2008. For those Republican voters out there - lucky you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ban obviously took its toll on the huge gaming companies listed in the UK as their shares nosedived on the announcement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's some media reports:&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9070-2384840,00.html"&gt;UK gamers hit by US online crackdown&lt;/a&gt; - Times Online&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gambling3oct03,0,3636746.story?coll=la-story-footer"&gt;Bad Luck for Online Gaming&lt;/a&gt; - LA Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27268800.shtml"&gt;Online Gaming: Good or Evil?&lt;/a&gt; - National Ledger</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/10/us-finally-pulls-plug-on-online.html' title='The US Finally Pulls the Plug on Online Gambling'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=115990010745730115' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/115990010745730115'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/115990010745730115'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-115350172056556905</id><published>2006-07-21T17:52:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-21T18:08:40.596+01:00</updated><title type='text'>The USA vs BetonSports: The Story So Far</title><content type='html'>As the US Conservatives seem desperate to create a new era of prohibition - this time using online gambling as its sorry excuse, they seem to be doing as much as possible, as quickly as possible to show the world how &lt;strike&gt;stupid&lt;/strike&gt; strong...they really are&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's a quick rundown of whats happened so far&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - The House of Representatives agree to a bill to &lt;a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=FT&amp;Date=20060711&amp;ID=5859582" target="_blank"&gt;outlaw online-gambling&lt;/a&gt; - except horse racing and state sponsored lotteries. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- David Carruthers, CEO of BetonSports.com, &lt;a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.betonsports19jul19,0,731498.story?coll=bal-business-headlines" target="_blank"&gt;gets arrested during a stopover in Dallas.&lt;/a&gt; He and 10 others are charged with racketeering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060719.GAMBLING19/TPStory/TPBusiness/Europe/" target="_blank"&gt;UK online gambling stocks&lt;/a&gt; take a beating on the stock market&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://www.betonsports.com" target="_blank"&gt;Betonsports.com&lt;/a&gt; shuts down its website&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/2006/07/19/wto-gaming-inquiry-cx_lm_0719gaming.html" target="_blank"&gt;Antigua complains to the WTO&lt;/a&gt; about the US's behaviour claiming the US is violating International free trade laws. The WTO set up a committee to study the claims. The US no doubt couldn't care less. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Bodog gets nervous and &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ZDM/story?id=2217317" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strike&gt;cancels&lt;/strike&gt; postpones its annual online gambling conference in Vegas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13970507/" target="_blank"&gt;David Carruthers remains in jail&lt;/a&gt; after his lawyer asks to postpone a bail meeting&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Partygaming ignores everything and &lt;a href="http://money.guardian.co.uk/businessnews/article/0,,1825950,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;reports huge increases in revenue.&lt;/a&gt; It maybe too late because they'd already lost a fifth of their value following the betonsports fiasco</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/07/usa-vs-betonsports-story-so-far.html' title='The USA vs BetonSports: The Story So Far'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=115350172056556905' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/115350172056556905'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/115350172056556905'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-114848934160158880</id><published>2006-05-24T17:49:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-24T17:49:01.776+01:00</updated><title type='text'>UK's Super Casino Shortlist</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5010808.stm"&gt;'Super-casino' shortlist set out&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;8 sites have been shortlisted for the UK's first foray into Las Vegas style Super Casinos. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From 27 applicants, the following made the cut:&lt;br /&gt;Wembley Stadium&lt;br /&gt;The Millenium Dome&lt;br /&gt;Cardiff&lt;br /&gt;Blackpool&lt;br /&gt;Manchester&lt;br /&gt;Newcastle&lt;br /&gt;Sheffield&lt;br /&gt;Glasgow&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only one gets the greenlight and there's 16 more licenses available that allows casinos to have jackpots over £4000. 60 councils have applied for these</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/05/uks-super-casino-shortlist.html' title='UK&apos;s Super Casino Shortlist'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5010808.stm' title='UK&apos;s Super Casino Shortlist'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=114848934160158880' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114848934160158880'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114848934160158880'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-114297673373633278</id><published>2006-03-21T21:32:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-03-21T21:32:13.800Z</updated><title type='text'>British Punters Fleeced by Credit Cards</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006130237,00.html"&gt;The Sun Online - News: New 'tax' on web gaming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If there's a way to make money on gambling, then you can be sure it'll be found - and the credit card companies have decided they don't make enough from consumers - they have to create a new invisible tax just for online gamblers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From May 1 anyone who uses their credit card to put money into an account will be charged as if they made a cash advance. MBNA already adds an extra 2%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A 'spokesperson' from RBS has tried to justify themselves to call it a cash advance - but since RBS has been involved in online gambling from the beginning - offering their services and trying to capture the market - it smacks of pure greed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It sounds as if they sniffed through their little book of definitions trying to find a way to profit even further from the cash heavy online gambling industry - and this is what they came up with.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So if the punter wins - do we charge the credit companies interest on our winning? No - thought not&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Time to use your debit card - and any other legit card that doesn't impose obscene taxes</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/03/british-punters-fleeced-by-credit.html' title='British Punters Fleeced by Credit Cards'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006130237,00.html' title='British Punters Fleeced by Credit Cards'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=114297673373633278' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114297673373633278'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114297673373633278'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-114253740138068861</id><published>2006-03-16T19:30:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-03-16T19:30:01.456Z</updated><title type='text'>US Gambling Bill Doesn't Concern 888</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4812664.stm" target="_blank"&gt;888 brushes off US legal concerns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Life is a lot easier when you've just reported a 16% increase in annual profits. 888.com announced its pre-tax profits to Dec 05 totalled $50.2m. Not bad for the casino giant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the press is more concerned with recent developments in the US where a bunch of congressment with too much time on their hands are trying again to get a bill through that would ban online gambling. The bill has now moved to the House floor for consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But 888 don't think it will go through - but even so, has worked to move its current playerbase from the US - although it still takes as much as 55% from American players. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;888 aren't the only ones though that thinks this way. Seems as if there's going to be &lt;a href="http://www.gambling-weblog.com/50226711/us_bill_to_ban_internet_gambling_backlash_begins.php" target="_Blank"&gt;plenty of opposition&lt;/a&gt; to the new gambling bill. Lets hope the US sees the sense in that sooner rather than later</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/03/us-gambling-bill-doesnt-concern-888.html' title='US Gambling Bill Doesn&apos;t Concern 888'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4812664.stm' title='US Gambling Bill Doesn&apos;t Concern 888'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=114253740138068861' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114253740138068861'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114253740138068861'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-114245457577673920</id><published>2006-03-15T20:29:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-03-15T20:29:35.813Z</updated><title type='text'>Too Much to Soon for Underage Bingo Player</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.gamblog.co.uk/2006/03/underage-bingo-player-loses-200k.htm" target="_Blank"&gt;Underage Bingo Player Loses 200k Payout&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over at &lt;a href="http:/.www.gamblog.co.uk" target="_Blank"&gt;Gamblog&lt;/a&gt; Jon is reporting on a 17-yr old girl who won the £200,000 on a national Linked bingo game at her local Commodore Club in Ryde, Isle of Wight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However club officials soon found out her age and promptly invalidated the claim.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It must have been a boost to her ego to pretend to be 18 and be allowed in the club in the first place - little did she realise the consequences</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/03/too-much-to-soon-for-underage-bingo.html' title='Too Much to Soon for Underage Bingo Player'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.gamblog.co.uk/2006/03/underage-bingo-player-loses-200k.htm#comments' title='Too Much to Soon for Underage Bingo Player'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=114245457577673920' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114245457577673920'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114245457577673920'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-114245163268492155</id><published>2006-03-15T19:36:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-03-15T19:40:32.716Z</updated><title type='text'>New Celebrity Betting Blog</title><content type='html'>OK - so i'm still ignoring this blog some what - but that will change!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the meantime, I've launched a new blog - solely for scurrilous celebrity betting, gossip and anything relating to novelty or what the bookies categorise 'special' bets. That includes reality TV, music, movies, politics, awards show - and just anything that doesn't really fit into sports, horse racing or football&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can read it all here - sometimes preferably with tongue firmly stuck in cheek. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.celebritybetting.co.uk" target="_blank"&gt;Celebrity Betting&lt;/a&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/03/new-celebrity-betting-blog.html' title='New Celebrity Betting Blog'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=114245163268492155' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114245163268492155'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114245163268492155'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-114066811690796348</id><published>2006-02-23T04:15:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-02-23T04:15:16.976Z</updated><title type='text'>Bookies Fall For Wembley Stadium Scam</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006080550,00.html"&gt;The Sun Online: Arch enemies of Wembley&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its been way too long since I posted to this blog. And as they see in the US. My bad. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I couldn't resist this (and thanks to Nick for pointing it out to me)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seems as if local bookies in the Wembley area fell for a construction scam that made them look like amateurs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Knowing full well they weren't going to hit the Wembley deadline for hosting the FA Cup this year, construction workers went to the local bookies to put £1000's on their odds of 13-8, 4-6, then 1-3 that the stadium wouldn't be ready. Finally betting was suspended, but that wasn't before they were taken for £10,000.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It would have taken a short bus ride to see the unfinished stadium for the bookies to realise it was unlikely the stadium would be finished. That cheap 50p ride cost them £10,000.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Made me laugh anyway</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2006/02/bookies-fall-for-wembley-stadium-scam.html' title='Bookies Fall For Wembley Stadium Scam'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006080550,00.html' title='Bookies Fall For Wembley Stadium Scam'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=114066811690796348' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114066811690796348'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/114066811690796348'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112800757623172723</id><published>2005-09-29T16:20:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-09-29T16:26:16.233+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Poker Chef Wins $1 million</title><content type='html'>Move over Jamie Oliver, here's a guy that not only cooks, but wins big at poker as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lee Biddulf had only ever won £28 before at poker, but this week arrived home $1 million richer after taking on 8 opponents at a poker tournament final in Costa Rica. 39,000 had entered the tournament&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Biddulf started playing poker in 2002 and felt the nerves. His final hand was a flush - as was his final opponent. But he kept his head and took the pot, and the overall tournament as he held the higher card &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not a bad way to make a living - now can I have 2 eggs on toast to go with that?</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/09/poker-chef-wins-1-million.html' title='Poker Chef Wins $1 million'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/4291226.stm' title='Poker Chef Wins $1 million'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112800757623172723' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112800757623172723'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112800757623172723'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112800707238727624</id><published>2005-09-29T16:12:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-09-29T16:17:52.393+01:00</updated><title type='text'>888.com Valued at $1.08bn</title><content type='html'>Online casino giant, 888.com -or Cassava - finally floated today, albeit at the lower end of their valuation prediction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The float makes 888 worth just over $1bn. Not quite as big as expected, and nowhere near PartyPoker, but still pretty large. The price was set at £1.75 per share.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So thats 3 down in recent weeks, albeit with the slight blip of 32Red's shaky floatation last week in which it did float, but not with any fundraising. &lt;br /&gt;It'll be interesting to see how many more come to market in the coming months</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/09/888com-valued-at-108bn.html' title='888.com Valued at $1.08bn'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/DocView.asp?did=1000017167&amp;fid=1725' title='888.com Valued at $1.08bn'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112800707238727624' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112800707238727624'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112800707238727624'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112800666775220535</id><published>2005-09-29T16:11:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-09-29T16:11:07.806+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Gala and Coral talk to create gambling empire</title><content type='html'>Looks like a new gambling empire may be born in the UK - and it isn't between online websites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number three bookie, Coral and bingo and casino group, Gala, are apparantly in talks to create a £4bn gambling empire. This is in reaction to the deregulation of the new Gambling Act - a joint operation could take advantage of this&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government is set to allow one 'super-casino' under the new act - by including Coral in the mix, Gala could essentially offer a one-stop shop for punters, under one very large roof&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Coral are still looking to float - and have been for years. And they will continue to pursue this if the Gala interest fails. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is the world ready for an all-encompassing gambling empire? Does anyone care? Point of fact - Ladbrokes got rid of their casino product (sold it to Gala) a few years back to concentrate solely on betting - are they regretting that decision in light of the deregulation or was there a reason for it? Finally, is there really any synergy between betting, casinos and bingo - or is it essentially an ego boost for the 2 companies involved?&lt;br /&gt;I think i'll be quiet now and wait to see what happens.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/09/gala-and-coral-talk-to-create-gambling.html' title='Gala and Coral talk to create gambling empire'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1580406,00.html' title='Gala and Coral talk to create gambling empire'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112800666775220535' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112800666775220535'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112800666775220535'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112740586733174425</id><published>2005-09-22T17:17:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-09-22T17:17:47.393+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Its Another Boom for Mobile Phone Gambling</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article314007.ece" target="_Blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gambling by mobile phone is booming &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Someone once asked me when I thought mobile phone gambling was going to 'take off' - I said within 2 years - but don't ask me which 2 years. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So once again, research groups are trying to earn their money by telling us that mobile phone gambling has 'exploded' or 'rocketed' or is 'booming' or any other supersonic adjective we can think of. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They actually measure these figures by the number of 'pages downloaded'. For an industry that is run by real financial numbers, thats an amazing research technique - and tells us nothing we need to know about the actual real amount of betting or gambling that actually takes place. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But for the research companies its a good living - and for the betting companies, these kind of numbers look good to the shareholders. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So mobile gambling - boom away.&lt;br /&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/09/its-another-boom-for-mobile-phone.html' title='Its Another Boom for Mobile Phone Gambling'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article314007.ece' title='Its Another Boom for Mobile Phone Gambling'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112740586733174425' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112740586733174425'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112740586733174425'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112736262955229278</id><published>2005-09-22T05:09:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-09-22T05:17:09.560+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Casino Goes up in Smoke</title><content type='html'>Wow - I feel like i've been away for weeks - and I probably have. Although in all this, I was at the G2E casino expo in Vegas - so all wasn't too bad.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I dount I've missed much though - Chelsea is still unbeaten, of course The Ashes is noteworthy (and fantastic), Cryptologic has announced plans to launch Marvel comic slots to rival Microgaming's Lara Croft game and Senator John Kyl finally got told to shut up with his plans to ban online gambling - although I still can't see the US make any progress on legalising it instead. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So instead, here's a real Internet stalwart - collapsing buildings.&lt;br /&gt;If you've ever wanted to see a casino go up in smoke, &lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9426909/" target="_blank"&gt;here's the controlled implosion of the Grand Casino in Gulfport,&lt;/a&gt; that was ravaged in Hurricane Katrina and was flung somewhere on a highway</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/09/casino-goes-up-in-smoke.html' title='Casino Goes up in Smoke'/><link rel='related' href='http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9426909/' title='Casino Goes up in Smoke'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112736262955229278' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112736262955229278'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112736262955229278'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112485176893531752</id><published>2005-08-24T03:39:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-24T03:49:28.943+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Gamblers and Monkeys are Closer than Ever</title><content type='html'>Who'd have guessed, huh?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can't resist research studies like this&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems monkeys are pretty big gamblers when faced with a choice of risk or steady rewards. And as the stakes rise, so will their risk-taking.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically, a set of male rhesus monkeys were given a choice of 2 lights that would yield them a reward. One light would give a steady reward of juice, whilst the risky light would either offer a smaller amount or a larger amount - there was a significant result of the monkeys preferring to gamble. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On this first test, over time, the average amount of juice was the same. However, in a second test, the odds were shifted to make the risky light less of a reward than the steady light. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And again, the results favoured the risky light. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was clear the monkeys preferred the idea of the big reward - which cancelled out any losses they suffered. When wired up, the researchers also found that neuron activity increased as the frequency of the monkeys choosing the light did&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like monkey like gambler? well, with a bit more research, it could be true!</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/08/gamblers-and-monkeys-are-closer-than.html' title='Gamblers and Monkeys are Closer than Ever'/><link rel='related' href='http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9045343/' title='Gamblers and Monkeys are Closer than Ever'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112485176893531752' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112485176893531752'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112485176893531752'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112388106944974979</id><published>2005-08-12T22:11:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-12T22:11:09.500+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Now its Betrosexual as Female Poker Players Turn Male</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15847871&amp;amp;method=full&amp;amp;siteid=94762&amp;amp;headline=betrosexuals--name_page.html"&gt;BETROSEXUALS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who comes up with these terms? first its metrosexual, and now even online poker needs to get in on the act and have created the term "betrosexual".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So what are these creatures? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apparantly there are a number of female poker players online that use male names to give the impression, well, that they're male.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According the the 'experts', this is due to the faceless nature of online poker - which is currently seeing an influx of female players who have long avoided the 'real thing'. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without the facial expressions and body language of playing in real life, there are other ways to bluff - and it seems that if your opponent thinks you're the opposite sex, they would make different judgement choices.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whatever works I guess...</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/08/now-its-betrosexual-as-female-poker.html' title='Now its Betrosexual as Female Poker Players Turn Male'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15847871&amp;method=full&amp;siteid=94762&amp;headline=betrosexuals--name_page.html' title='Now its Betrosexual as Female Poker Players Turn Male'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112388106944974979' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112388106944974979'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112388106944974979'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112312789868162303</id><published>2005-08-04T04:58:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-04T04:58:18.733+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Sentenced Contrary to the Gaming Act 1845</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.edgwaretimes.co.uk/news/localnews/display.var.619305.0.gambling_scam_rumbled.php"&gt;Gambling Scam Rumbled &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A man from North West London has made legal history by being sentenced 'contrary to the gaming act 1845'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Three men were accused of 'top hatting' in a game of roulette - which basically relies on all the relevant people in the casino - from the dealer to the security staff and other players - to be distracted just before the ball drops - giving them vital seconds to put chips on the winning number&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scam was ultimately spotted by casino security and the men were known gamblers that were banned from a number of casinos&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I suppose you have to be famous for something</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/08/sentenced-contrary-to-gaming-act-1845.html' title='Sentenced Contrary to the Gaming Act 1845'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.edgwaretimes.co.uk/news/localnews/display.var.619305.0.gambling_scam_rumbled.php' title='Sentenced Contrary to the Gaming Act 1845'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112312789868162303' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112312789868162303'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112312789868162303'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112260809813187314</id><published>2005-07-29T04:30:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-29T04:34:58.136+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Big Brother 6 - Latest Odds</title><content type='html'>I can't believe this is my first big brother post - must be more dull than usual I guess.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 9th eviction seems to be a given with Orlaith at 2/9 whilst Anthony continues to strengthen as outright favourite to win at 2/5. Eugene is second favourite at 4/1. Thing with Big Brother is that almost anything can happen on anyday which can change the odds drastically - but for now, its all fairly straightforward it seems&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Big Brother 6 - 9th Eviction &lt;/strong&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/sportsbook.asp?aff=a26042B" onclick="Javascript:var tagImage=new Image(1,1);tagImage.src='http://webmasters.willhill.com/aw.asp?B=27&amp;A=468&amp;Task=Click&amp;sb=26042B';" target="_blank"&gt;All Odds Taken from William Hill&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Orlaith 2/9    &lt;br /&gt;Kemal 3/1 &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Big Brother 6 - Outright  &lt;/strong&gt;     &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/sportsbook.asp?aff=a26042B" onclick="Javascript:var tagImage=new Image(1,1);tagImage.src='http://webmasters.willhill.com/aw.asp?B=27&amp;A=468&amp;Task=Click&amp;sb=26042B';" target="_blank"&gt;All Odds Taken from William Hill&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Anthony 2/5    &lt;br /&gt;Eugene 4/1    &lt;br /&gt;Makosi 9/1    &lt;br /&gt;Derek 12/1    &lt;br /&gt;Craig 14/1    &lt;br /&gt;Kemal 20/1    &lt;br /&gt;Orlaith 50/1</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/07/big-brother-6-latest-odds.html' title='Big Brother 6 - Latest Odds'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112260809813187314' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112260809813187314'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112260809813187314'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112131416998367911</id><published>2005-07-14T05:04:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-14T05:09:29.990+01:00</updated><title type='text'>British Open Golf - Latest Odds</title><content type='html'>As expected, Tiger Woods has been made clear favourite to take the 134th Open - but that just offers value elsewhere in the field.&lt;br /&gt;Whilst Tiger is at a restrictive 5/2, consistant Vijay Singh is at a nice each way 16/1, Els is 8/1 and Goosen is 18/1. Noticeable also is US Open champion Michael Campbell, who if he can keep up that form, is at a massive 66/1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Golf :  134th Open - Outright&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/sportsbook.asp?aff=a26042B" onclick="Javascript:var tagImage=new Image(1,1);tagImage.src='http://webmasters.willhill.com/aw.asp?B=27&amp;A=468&amp;Task=Click&amp;sb=26042B';" target="_blank"&gt;All Odds Taken from William Hill&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Woods T 5/2   &lt;br /&gt;Els E 8/1   &lt;br /&gt;Singh V 16/1   &lt;br /&gt;Mickelson P 18/1   &lt;br /&gt;Goosen R 18/1   &lt;br /&gt;Garcia S 20/1   &lt;br /&gt;Donald L 25/1   &lt;br /&gt;Clarke D 25/1   &lt;br /&gt;Westwood L 33/1   &lt;br /&gt;Scott A 33/1   &lt;br /&gt;Love I I I D 33/1   &lt;br /&gt;Furyk J 33/1   &lt;br /&gt;Cabrera A 40/1 &lt;br /&gt;Campbell M 66/1 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All Players and Alternative Markets available at &lt;a href="http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/sportsbook.asp?aff=a26042B" onclick="Javascript:var tagImage=new Image(1,1);tagImage.src='http://webmasters.willhill.com/aw.asp?B=27&amp;A=468&amp;Task=Click&amp;sb=26042B';" target="_blank"&gt;William Hill&lt;/a&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/07/british-open-golf-latest-odds.html' title='British Open Golf - Latest Odds'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112131416998367911' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112131416998367911'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112131416998367911'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-112066510584943250</id><published>2005-07-06T16:51:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-06T16:51:45.893+01:00</updated><title type='text'>London to Hold 2012 Olympic Games</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/front_page/4655555.stm"&gt;London beats Paris to 2012 Games&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was one of those announcements that just makes you go 'wow'. However, whilst Paris was the favourite for a long time - apparantly London won most rounds of voting - bar one. So someone's information somewhere was very wrong&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it was still a hell of a surprise - and a great one! will be good to see how London handles the olympics - and how much prices go up to pay for it&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would feel sorry for the French - thats 3 times in recent years they've been denied - but I wasn't too sorry when I saw a sportsman on CNN earlier claiming the London contingent 'cheated' - not the best way to take the loss methinks</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/07/london-to-hold-2012-olympic-games.html' title='London to Hold 2012 Olympic Games'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/front_page/4655555.stm' title='London to Hold 2012 Olympic Games'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=112066510584943250' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112066510584943250'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/112066510584943250'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-111991104646124128</id><published>2005-06-27T23:24:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-06-27T23:24:06.500+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Partygaming Finally Becomes a PLC</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4625461.stm"&gt;Partygaming shares rise on debut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The owners of Partypoker.com have finally floated on the London Stock Exchange with an increase of 11% on their first day. They are now valued at over £4.5bn&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can we move on now please?</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/2005/06/partygaming-finally-becomes-plc.html' title='Partygaming Finally Becomes a PLC'/><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4625461.stm' title='Partygaming Finally Becomes a PLC'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7433099&amp;postID=111991104646124128' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.ukgambling.net/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/111991104646124128'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7433099/posts/default/111991104646124128'/><author><name>jo</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7433099.post-111928571558976931</id><published>2005-06-20T17:15:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-06-20T17:41:55.606+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Why not Boycott Formula One?</title><content type='html'>OK - I'll apologise in advance - this has nothing to do with gambling.&lt;br /&gt;But at this point -  I don't care. Here comes a rant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was in Indianapolis on Sunday for the sham they called the US Grand Prix - and out of everybody involved - everyone was to blame except Indianapolis, who quite simply, barring a preacher giving a sermon pre-race, didn't deserve the arrogant, obnoxious, greedy Formula One 'sport' descend upon their nice city and ruin their reputation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So - I blame Michelin for changing their tyres from ones that worked in Spain. Then telling the teams not to allow the drivers to race. I want to see the results of the tests of their tyres. Idiots.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame the teams for their arrogance. They allowed the show to go on as if nothing was wrong(parade lap) and then pulled the drivers from the race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame the drivers. On interviews pre-race, knowing full well what was about to happen, they spoke about winning and driving. They were smiling and waving on a presentation grid an hour before the race. They didn't defy their teams to give the fans a race. Slow right down at the corner if they had too. But race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame the FIA for being so unrepentant and pig-headed not to change their rules to give the fans (who spent thousands to see the 'race') a good show. Make it a non-championship race for all I care. Just give us something to watch. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame the FIA for backing Ferrari and not allowing a chicane at the 'dangerous' bend. 9 out of 10 teams accepted the chicane&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame the Ferrari team for being unsportsmanlike and ensuring changes were made so they could have a race. Who cares about the points at this stage. They should have allowed the chicane&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame Michael Schumacher for continuing to race and not pulling out as soon as he realised this. If he did, they would have abandoned the race and we would have at least got our money back&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame Bridgestone for not asking the FIA to allow Michelin to get new tyres over&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I blame Ecclestone for allowing this happen. Why do the fans have to put up with the politics of this pathetic spectacle&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was in a stand with a huge group of Colombians who had travelled to see Montoya. They left after lap 3.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An american behind me had taken his 8 yr old kid to see a race for the first time. Most likely it'll be the last. They left at lap 30.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most people left at lap 10. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vendors at the track lost money. Indianapolis no doubt lost money as everyone clamoured to get earlier flights and may not return next year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The local 'commentary' team were speechless. Indianapolis Motor Speedway were embarrasse